BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Denní medievista - ECPv6.15.18//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://medievista.cz
X-WR-CALDESC:Akce na Denní medievista
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Prague
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20160327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20161030T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20170326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20171029T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20180325T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20181028T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171002T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171003T170000
DTSTAMP:20260405T220351
CREATED:20170829T203607Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20170829T205717Z
UID:10001114-1506931200-1507050000@medievista.cz
SUMMARY:Zikmund Lucemburský a město Tábor. Královská moc a městské komunity v pozdně středověké Evropě
DESCRIPTION:U příležitosti 580. výročí udělení městských práv Táboru římským císařem a českým králem Zikmundem Lucemburským v roce 1437 se chceme zaměřit na vztah mezi královskou mocí a městy v Českém království v komparaci s poměry v dalších státech střední Evropy. Zůstávala královská města jen zásobárnou ekonomických a vojenských zdrojů pro svého panovníka? Jak a proč usilovala o podíl na politické moci a proměňovala se v konkurenty krále v této oblasti. Jaké důsledky měl vztah krále a městských komunit pro utváření stavovské společnosti ve střední Evropě? Jak ovlivňovaly proměny královské moci speciálně v Čechách osudy polipanského husitství až do habsburské éry? K zamyšlení nad těmito i souvisejícími otázkami by mělo přispět i vědecké setkání\, jež na dny 2.–3. října 2017 připravuje Husitské muzeum v Táboře ve spolupráci s Centrem medievistických studií Praha. Setkání se bude konat ve Wellness hotelu Palcát v Táboře (Česká republika).
URL:https://medievista.cz/akce/zikmund-lucembursky-a-mesto-tabor-kralovska-moc-a-mestske-komunity-v-pozdne-stredoveke-evrope/
LOCATION:Hotel Palcát\, 9. května 2471\, Tábor\, 39002\, Česká republika
CATEGORIES:Konference a semináře,Vše
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://medievista.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/erb-tabor-1437.jpg
GEO:49.4128901;14.6666086
X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION;VALUE=URI;X-ADDRESS=Hotel Palcát 9. května 2471 Tábor 39002 Česká republika;X-APPLE-RADIUS=500;X-TITLE=9. května 2471:geo:14.6666086,49.4128901
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171003T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171004T170000
DTSTAMP:20260405T220351
CREATED:20170829T204120Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20170829T204524Z
UID:10001115-1507017600-1507136400@medievista.cz
SUMMARY:Thiddag. Intelektuál a říšský biskup
DESCRIPTION:(hlavní budova FF UK; místnosti 104\, 200) \n\n3.10. Úterý\n9:30 Zahájení \n10:00 Franz-Reiner Erkens\, Das Reich und Böhmen um die erste Jahrtausendwende (The Empire and Bohemia at the turn of the first millennium) \n10:40 Marie Bláhová\, Vera fidelium relatio. Die Informationen des Cosmas über dem Anfang von dem “historischen” Zeitalter der böhmischen Geschichte\n(The Cosmas’s information about the beginning of the „historical“ period of Bohemian history) \n11:20 Martin Wihoda\, Die Anfänge des Christentums in Böhmen\n(The Beginning of the Christianity in Bohemia) \n12:30-14:00 Oběd \n14:15 Drahomír Suchánek\, Bischof Thiddag und das Bischofsideal der Reichskirche am Anfang des 11. Jahrhunderts\n(Bishop Thiddag and the ideal of the bishop in the imperial Church at the beginning of the 11th Century) \n14:55 Iliana Kandzha\, Confessor\, Saint or Prosecutor: On Ritualized Relationship between Kings and Bishops through the Prism of Ottonian Historiography (919-1024) \n15:35 Daniel Ziemann\, Die Abtei Corvey und das Reich im 10. Jahrhundert\n(The Corvey Abbey and the Empire in the 10th Century) \n17:00 Prohlídka vybraného objektu (bude upřesněno) \n18:30 Společná večeře \n4.10. Středa\n10:00 Dana Picková\, Rusko\, Bulharsko a Říše na přelomu 10.‒11. století\n(Russia\, Bulgary and the Empire at the turn of 10th and 11th Century) \n10:40 Zbigniew Dalewski\, Religijne (sakralne) podstawy władzy Piastów\n(The religious (sacral) basis of the rule of the Piasts) \n11:20 Stanislaw Rosik\, Zaszczepianie chrześcijaństwa w krajach zachodniosłowiańskich w świetle kroniki Thietmara – egzemplifikacje modelowe: Połabie i Polska\n(The seeding of Christianity in the West-Slavic lands from the point of view of Thietmar’s Chronicle – modell examples: Elbe-region and Poland) \n12:30-14:00 Oběd \n14:15 David Kalhous\, Dalibor Havel\, Heligenkreuz 217: zur Rolle der karolingischen normativen Texte in Ostmitteleuropa um 1000\n(Heiligenkreuz 217: About the role of the Carolingian normative texts in the East-Central Europe around 1000) \n14:55 Tomáš Velímský\, Čechy a vlastnické kostely: K raně středověkým elitám v Čechách\n(Bohemia and private church: About the early medieval elites in Bohemia) \n15:35 Jakub Izdný\, Widukind\, Thietmar\, Thiddag: Spuren der Sachsenmission in Böhmen\n(Widukind\, Thietmar\, Thiddag: The traces of the Saxon mission in Bohemia) \n16:30 Zakončení
URL:https://medievista.cz/akce/thiddag-intelektual-a-rissky-biskup/
LOCATION:Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Karlovy\, nám. Jana Palacha 2\, Praha 1\, 116 38\, Česká republika
CATEGORIES:Konference a semináře,Vše
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://medievista.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/thiddag.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171004T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171004T190000
DTSTAMP:20260405T220351
CREATED:20171003T063752Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20171009T090206Z
UID:10001169-1507138200-1507143600@medievista.cz
SUMMARY:Digital Humanities and the Study of the Past
DESCRIPTION:The guest lecture series Digital Humanities and the Study of the Past (part of the Medieval Social Conflicts and Contrasts project) attempts to bring scholars working in the emerging field of Digital Humanities with the focus on Medieval or Early Modern topics to both local and international audience at the Faculty of Arts\, Charles University\, Prague. We hope to cover a number of a wide field of approaches and angles through presentations of successful digital projects or notable works in progress. \nThe 2017/18 Winter Term is convened by: Ondřej Tichý \nCourse material and student requirements are specified in Moodle\, SIS Code: AAA500153 (local students)\, AAA500153E (Erasmus students) \nProgramme / Syllabus at https://css.ff.cuni.cz/en/lecture-series-medieval-conflicts-and-contrasts/the-digital-methodologies-in-the-study-of-the-past/ \n\n\n4 October: Daniel Bradley\, Molecular Population Genetics Lab\, Trinity College\, Dublin\n\n\n\nBooks\, Bones and Genomes: DNA analysis of parchments and archaeological remains\n\nBy comparing genomes from ancient animals and humans we can uncover new information about the past.  This is a golden age of ancient DNA. Knowledge of those materials which preserve DNA best such as parchments or particularly dense mammalian bones\, coupled with new sequencing technologies\, has enabled us to retrieve whole genomes from the past on a routine basis.  This has allowed us\, for example\, to add a dimension to the material study of ancient manuscripts and to infer the major population transitions in European prehistory\, placing migration firmly back as a central theme in understanding cultural change. \nReferences: \n\nGenomic signals of migration and continuity in Britain before the Anglo-Saxons. Martiniano R\, et al Nat Commun. 2016 Jan 19;7:10326. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10326.\nNeolithic and Bronze Age migration to Ireland and establishment of the insular Atlantic genome. Cassidy LM\, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 12;113(2):368-73. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518445113. Epub 2015 Dec 28.\nThe York Gospels: a one thousand year biological  palimpsest    Matthew D. Teasdale et al. 2017 BiorXiv  doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/146324.\nUpper Palaeolithic genomes reveal deep roots of modern Eurasians. Jones ER\, et al. Nat Commun. 2015 Nov 16;6:8912. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9912.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n11 October: Michael Pidd\, Director of The Digital Humanities Institute\, University of Sheffield\n\n\n\nManuscripts\, Models\, and Ownership: Bringing Data Together\n\nConnected Histories (http://www.connectedhistories.org) and its sister site Manuscripts Online (http://www.manuscriptsonline.org) enable users to undertake structured searches across many distributed online historical datasets. The combined resources equate to approximately 30 billion data records. The aim was to realise the dream that mutliple datasets can be brought together in one place and combined to create new knowledge\, but the process of doing this was challenging due to the nature of the datasets themselves: strange transcriptions; weird data models; and restrictive ownership. In this talk I will explore the difficulties of developing research resources for historical and literary studies that use multiple datasets\, and show some of the computational (and human!) solutions for addressing these problems. Examples will be taken from the following DHI projects: Manuscripts Online\, Connected Histories\, Intoxicants and Early Modernity\, and Digital Panopticon. The talk will also introduce the following technologies and methods for non-experts: data capture\, data modelling\, licensing\, data visualisation\, natural language processing\, and nominal record linkage. \n\n\n\n\n\n18 October: Reading Week (No Lecture)\n\n\n\n\n\n25 October: Marjorie Burghart\, Centre national de la recherche scientifique\, Lyon\n\n\n\nDigital Editions and the TEI standard for DH\nAbstract coming soon…\n\n\n\n\n1 November: Brittany Schorn\, Department of Anglo-Saxon\, Norse and Celtic\, University of Cambridge\n\n\n\nGersum: Identifying Old Norse lexis in the Poetry of the Alliterative Revival\n\nThe study of the rich and diverse Old Norse influence on the medieval English lexicon is very challenging\, not least etymologically: given the genetic proximity of the languages in contact\, it can be extremely difficult to identify which English words really do show input from Old Norse. In recent years there has been intensive etymological and contextual work on the Norse-derived vocabulary of some texts and traditions\, especially before c. 1300 (see esp. Pons-Sanz 2007\, 2013; Dance 2003\, 2011).  Nevertheless\, the Scandinavian influence on the vocabulary of the great later Middle English literary monuments has rarely seen sustained exploration\, and texts composed in the north and east of England\, where the influence from Old Norse is attested in its greatest range and complexity\, have not been treated together in a major\, etymologically analytical study since Björkman’s survey of 1900–2. \nIn this paper\, I shall describe the new methodological framework developed for the Gersum Project (a three-year project\, begun in January 2016 and funded by the U.K.’s Arts and Humanities Research Council; see www.gersum.org) which is undertaking a detailed study of the etymologies of c. 1600 words for which Old Norse input has been claimed\, by means of a searchable online database. \nWorks Cited \nBjörkman\, E.\, Scandinavian Loan-Words in Middle English\, 2 vols.\, Studien zur englischen Philologie 7\, 11 (Halle\, 1900–2) \nDance\, R.\, Words Derived from Old Norse in Early Middle English: Studies in the Vocabulary of the South-West Midland Texts\, Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies 246 (Tempe\, AZ\, 2003) \n———\, ‘“Tomarȝan hit is awane”: Words Derived from Old Norse in Four Lambeth Homilies’\, in Foreign Influences on Medieval English\, ed. J. Fisiak and M. Bator\, Studies in English Medieval Language and Literature 28 (Frankfurt am Main\, 2011)\, pp. 77–127 \nPons-Sanz\, S. M.\, Norse-Derived Vocabulary in Late Old English Texts: Wulfstan’s Works\, a Case Study\, NOWELE Supplement Series 22 (Odense\, 2007) \n———\, The Lexical Effects of Anglo-Scandinavian Linguistic Contact on Old English\, Studies in the Early Middle Ages 1 (Turnhout\, 2013) \nTownend\, M.\, Language and History in Viking Age England: Linguistic Relations Between Speakers of Old Norse and Old English\, Studies in the Early Middle Ages 6 (Turnhout\, 2002) \n\n\n\n\n\n8 November: Kerstin Majewski\, Instituts für Englische Philologie\, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München\n\n\n\nThe Runes Project & The Reconstruction of the Runes on the Ruthwell Cross\n\nThis paper introduces the research project RuneS and deals in detail with one of its doctoral theses. \nThe research project “Runic writing in the Germanic languages (RuneS)”\, funded by the Union of the German Academies of Sciences and based at the Goettingen Academy of Sciences and Humanities\, includes three research units\, at the universities of Kiel\, Goettingen\, and Eichstätt-Munich. The project analyzes the runic script as a writing system within its historico-cultural context. It especially focuses on phonemic\, graphemic and text-pragmatic aspects\, in particular on investigating the relationship between runic and Latin writing. \nThe doctoral thesis The Reconstruction of the Runic Text on the Ruthwell Cross has grown out of the Eichstätt-Munich research group. It deals with the longest inscription in Old English runes\, which is carved on two panels of the 8th ct. Ruthwell Cross ‒ a Christian stone-cross now located in Dumfries and Galloway\, Scotland. The inscription is comprised of a four stanza poem written in an early Northumbrian dialect. The poem narrates the crucifixion episode from a unique point of view: the cross is the speaker. \nThe thesis attempts to reconstruct the Ruthwell Crucifixion Poem. With one third of the runes illegible\, a restoration of the text proves to be difficult. What is more\, in some instances even the remaining runes have encouraged scholarly debate. For example\, the Old English word rōdi ‘rod’\, referring to Christ’s cross\, shows an unusal i-ending; recently\, the form stemn ‘stem (of a tree)’ has been suggested instead\, considering rōdi a mistake by the carver/designer. The present paper discusses the use of Old English rōd ‘rod; cross’ and gealga ‘gallows; cross’ written on the Ruthwell Cross through a comparative analysis of the runic poem with contemporary religious texts in Latin and Old English. \n\n \nThe Ruthwell Cross\, West Face (Majewski 2012) \n\n\n \nThe Ruthwell Cross\, East Face (Majewski 2012) \n\n\n\n\n\n\n15 November (in Czech): Boris Lehečka\, Institute of Czech Language\, Czech Academy of Sciences\, Prague\n\n\n\nDigital and analog humanities: one or two worlds?\n\nPřednáška představí na příkladu diachronní bohemistiky názory klasických\, „analogových“ lingvistů na možnosti využití digitálních technologií při jejich práci\, a to z pohledu počítačového odborníka\, který se snaží prosazovat moderní technologie v tomto oboru od počátku 21. století. Výsledkem společného úsilí jsou zejména stránky Vokabulář webový (http://vokabular.ujc.cas.cz). Přednášející se pokusí hledat cestu\, jak analogové a digitální humanitní vědy sbližovat. \nIllustrated by the example of diachronic Czech studies\, the lecture will present the ideas of the classical “analog” linguists concerning of using digital technologies in their work. These ideas will be reflected from the point of view of a computer expert who has been striving to promote modern technologies in this field from the beginning of the 21st Century. The web site Vokabulář webový (Web Vocabulary; http://vokabular.ujc.cas.cz) represents a good example of such a joint effort. The presenter will focus on finding paths towards convergence of the analog and digital humanities. \n\n\n\n\n\n22 November: Franz Fischer\, Cologne Center for eHumanities\, Universität zu Köln\n\n\n\nPeople from the Past – Saint Patrick\, the Emperor and Pessoa through their Writings\n\nIn my talk\, I am going to present a wide range of digital edition projects I am involved in as an editor and collaborator at the Cologne Center for eHumanities. A focus will be on the methodologies applied in order to find answers to the old and fundamental question of what famous people of the past actually wrote. What do we really know about Patrick\, the patron Saint of Ireland? What did the original decrees of early medieval emperors and rulers look like? What did Magister Guillelmus actually teach to his students in the early days of the Parisian university? What is the nature of the ingenious and chimerical work of the Portuguese poet Fernando Pessoa? How did the virtuous Swiss writer Hermann Burger create his first novel? How did the great German sociologist Niklas Luhmann develop his systems theory in practical terms? \n\n\n\n\n\n29 November: Catherine Richardson\, Centre for Medieval and Early Modern Studies (School of English)\, University of Kent\n\n\n\nEarly modern English domestic interiors – digital methods\n\nThe early modern English household was central to early modern life – the foundational space of social\, economic\, religious and political cultures. It was not\, of course\, just a family matter: it was seen as crucial for the maintenance of early modern social order\, as household heads were responsible for their families\, servants and apprentices. Actions within the household were therefore foundational to the formation of status and gendered identity\, but also had wide political consequences – they mattered greatly in early modern England. The wider project from which this paper comes seeks to understand domestic experience – what it felt like to live in such a household\, and what defined the connections between spaces\, objects and human activity. \nThe paper surveys the digital methods by which we have explored the structuring of domestic experience\, including mobile eye-tracking\, 3D scanning and room reconstruction of various kinds\, and time-lapse photography. It investigates the benefits and frustrations of these methods for addressing such questions as: how were behaviours located within an evolving domestic material environment? How were lifestyles formed day by day\, hour by hour? Finally\, in conclusion\, it aims to imagine what other digital possibilities there might be for exploring and representing domestic experience in the future\, and what questions they may be able to address. \n  \n\n\n\n\n\n6 December: Jenny Benham\, School of History\, Archaeology and Religion\, Cardiff University\n\n\n\nEarly English Laws Project\n\nAbstract coming soon… \nhttp://www.earlyenglishlaws.ac.uk/ \n\n\n\n\n\n13 December: Tuomas Heikkilä\, Faculty of Theology\, University of Helsinki\n\n\n\nManuscripts and Computers: Exploring Medieval Textual Traditions (Stemmatology)\n\nPast decades have experienced the rise of new\, innovative methods within the field of textual scholarship. Philologists and historians have found new friends in computer scientists\, evolutionary biologists\, statisticians\, and mathematicians\, for instance\, and the humanities are now eagerly cooperating with the sciences. \nThe lecture explores and illustrates some fresh approaches\, new possibilities and computerized tools designed for studying ancient and medieval textual traditions. What is the current status quo of the field? How can the novel methods help the scholar of old texts in establishing the critical text\, and in studying the cultural history of a textual tradition? \n\n\n\n\n\n20 December: David Novák\, Institute of Acrheology\, Czech Academy of Sciences\n\n\n\nGeographic Information Systems in Archeology\n\nArchaeology is a field of research highly interconnected with the spatial information. Therefore in 1990s\, introduction of the GIS brought rapid development in the archaeological methods and theory\, esp. concerning landscape archaeology\, documentation techniques and spatial analysis. Lecture will provide general overview of the possible applications of the GIS in archaeology; in higher detail\, it will stress importance of the digital tools for landscape research (spatial relations\, remote sensing\, geomorphometry) and for the building of common knowledge base (predictive modelling; digital infrastructures). \nResources: \nGojda\, M. – John\, J. (eds.) 2013: Archaeology and Airborne Laser Scanning of the Landscape. Plzeň. \nHengl\, T. – Reuter\, H.I. (eds.) 2009: Geomorphometry: Concepts\, Software\, Applications. Amsterdam. \nKuna a kol. 2015: Structuring archaeological evidence: The Archaeological Map of the Czech Republic and related information systems. Prague. \nKuna\, M. et al. 2004: Nedestruktivní archeologie. Teorie\, metody a cíle. [Non-destructive archaeology. Theory\, methods and goals]. Praha. \nvan Leusen\, M. 2002: Pattern to Process: Methodological Investigations into the Formation and Interpretation of Spatial Patterns in Archaeological Landscapes. Utrecht. \nWheatley\, D. – Gillings\, M. 2002: Spatial Technology and Archaeology: The archaeological applications of GIS. London – New York. \nhttp://www.aiscr.cz/en/ – Archaeological Information System of the Czech Republic \n\n\n\n\n\n3 January: Final Essay
URL:https://medievista.cz/akce/digital-humanities-and-the-study-of-the-past/2017-10-04/
LOCATION:Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Karlovy – Hybernská 3\, Hybernská 3\, Praha 1\, 11800
CATEGORIES:Doktorandské,Periodické,Přednášky,Vše
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://medievista.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/banner_web.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171005T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171007T140000
DTSTAMP:20260405T220351
CREATED:20171003T062540Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20171003T062640Z
UID:10001167-1507194000-1507384800@medievista.cz
SUMMARY:Crusading and the Crusader Movement in the Peripheries of the Christian West 1100–1500
DESCRIPTION:International Conference\, October 5-7\, 2017\, Marburg\, organized by Herder Institute\, University of Ostrava\, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel in Cooperation with the DFG-Network „Stils curiae“ at Ludwig-Maximilians-University München\, supported by Fritz Thyssen Stiftung für Wissenschaftsförderung \nThursday 5th October \n09.00 Welcome and Introduction Norbert Kersken (Marburg) / Paul Srodecki (Kiel/Ostrava)\nChair: Felicitas Schmieder (Hagen)\n09.30 Norbert Kersken (Marburg) German and Polish Crusaders against the Polabian Slavs\n10.15 Eric Böhme (Leipzig) The Legitimation of a Peripheral Crusade. King Amalric of Jerusalem and the Frankish Campaign against Egypt\, 1163\n11.00 Coffee Break\n11.15 Jens E. Olesen (Greifswald) The Swedish Crusades towards Finland from a Baltic Perspective\n12.00 Christian Krötzl (Tampere) Crusades\, Mission and the Cult of Saints in the Eastern Baltic\n12.45 Lunch Break\nChair: Alan V. Murray (Leeds)\n13.45 Iben Fonnesberg-Schmidt (Aalborg) Papal Curia’s Perception of Crusading in the Baltic Region\n14.30 Robert Antonin (Ostrava) The Crusade and anti-Pagan Rhetoric in the Foreign Policy and Propaganda of the Last Přemyslids\n15.15 Dalibor Janiš (Ostrava) The Lords of Cimburg and the Crusades to Prussia in the 14th and 15th Centuries\n16.00 Coffee Break\nChair: Norbert Kersken (Marburg)\n16.15 Georg Strack (Munich) Tarragona or Jerusalem? Pope Urban II and the Target(s) of the Early Crusaders\n17.00 Paul Srodecki (Kiel/Ostrava) Andrés Dias de Escobar and the Ideological Parallels between the Iberian Reconquista and the “Reisen” of the Teutonic Order\n17.45 Klaus Herbers (Erlangen) Kreuzzug und Missionierung – Portugals Aufbruch in neue Welten im 15. Jahrhundert\n18.30 Coffee Break \n18.45 Keynote Lecture: Norman Housley (Leicester) \nCommunication between Centre and Periphery in Fifteenth Century Crusading\nFriday 6th October\nChair: Paul Srodecki (Kiel/Ostrava)\n09.00 Alan V. Murray (Leeds) Chivalry and Internationalism in the Crusading Movement after 1291\n09.45 Darius von Güttner-Sporzynski (Melbourne) Was the Periphery Reluctant in Accepting the Idea of Crusade? The Case of Poland under the Piast Dynasty\n10.30 Coffee Break\n10.45 Andrzej Marzec (Cracow) Infideles et perfidi schismatici. Crusades and Christianization as Political Tools in the Hands of Polish Kings in the 14th century\n11.30 Sven Jaros (Leipzig) Against Tatari\, Rutheni et Litfani\, hostes fidei. Role and Ambivalence of the Crusading Idea Concerning the Polish Integration of Ruthenia in the 2nd Half of the 14th Century\n12.15 Adam Szweda (Toruń) Die Kreuzzugsidee als Gegenstand der Beziehungen zwischen Polen und dem Deutschen Orden nach 1466\n13.00 Lunch Break\nChair: Dennis Hormuth (Marburg)\n14.00 Sergey Polekhov (Moscow) Zwischen Kreuzzügen und Bündnissen: Die Politik des Großfürsten Witolds von Litauen (1392-1430) gegen die östlichen Nachbarn\n14.45 Darius Baronas (Vilnius) Lithuanian Participation in the Crusading Movement in the Long Fifteenth Century\n15.30 Rimvydas Petrauskas (Vilnius) Ziel- oder Ausgangsort? Das Großfürstentum Litauen als verlängerter Arm der Kreuzzugsbewegung vom Ende des 14. bis zum Beginn des 16. Jahrhunderts\n16.15 Coffee Break\nChair: Robert Antonin (Ostrava)\n16.30 Nora Berend (Cambridge) The Centrality of the Crusading Periphery: Hungarian Rhetoric about the Crusades\n17.15 Attila Bárány (Debrecen) Hungary and the “passagium particulare” after Nicopolis (1396-1437) \nSaturday 7th October\nChair: Georg Strack (München)\n09.00 Zdzisław Pentek (Poznań) Warum kamen so wenige Kreuzfahrer in das Heilige Land aus Osteuropa?\n09.45 Neven Budak (Zagreb) Crusades in the Kingdom of Hungary\, Dalmatia and Croatia – Imaginary\, Abused\, Failed\n10.30 Emir O. Filipović (Sarajevo) Converting Heretics into Crusaders on the Fringes of Latin Christendom: Shifting Crusading Paradigms in Medieval Bosnia\n11.15 Coffee Break\nChair: Jessika Nowak (Munich)\n11.30 Nevyan Mitev (Varna) The Last Crusades on the Balkans from 1443-1444 or the Union between Central and Southeastern Europe against the Ottoman Invasion\n12.15 Mihai-D. Grigore (Mainz)\nArmy Inspection and Crusade. Wallachia and Leo X’s Crusade Plans\n13.00 CONFERENCE SUMMARY Norman Housley (Leicester)
URL:https://medievista.cz/akce/crusading-and-the-crusader-movement-in-the-peripheries-of-the-christian-west-1100-1500/
LOCATION:Herder-Institut\, Gisonenweg 5-7\, Marburg\, 35037
CATEGORIES:Konference a semináře,Vše
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://medievista.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/crusades_Herder.jpg
GEO:50.80929;8.76146
X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION;VALUE=URI;X-ADDRESS=Herder-Institut Gisonenweg 5-7 Marburg 35037;X-APPLE-RADIUS=500;X-TITLE=Gisonenweg 5-7:geo:8.76146,50.80929
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171005T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171005T180000
DTSTAMP:20260405T220351
CREATED:20171003T070334Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20171005T074223Z
UID:10001181-1507219200-1507226400@medievista.cz
SUMMARY:O konceptu vědění a jeho přenosech: Obohacení\, nebo ohrožení?
DESCRIPTION:V současné době se zejména v společensko-politickém kontextu opět hodně mluví o kompatibilitě či nekompatibilitě kulturních a civilizačních okruhů\, o mezikulturní výměně a jejích důsledcích\, o vzájemném obohacování či rizicích plynoucích z prostorové a společenské provázanosti skupin s odlišným etnickým\, kulturním či ideologickým pozadím. Přestože jsou ve své dnešní podobě tyto debaty výrazně ovlivněny specifickou geopolitickou a kulturní situací přelomu tisíciletí\, nejsou ani zdaleka nové. Středověká společnost si ve své mnohobarevnosti a vzájemné provázanosti v ničím nezadala se svou postmoderní kolegyní a otázky po vzdělání i náležitém přístupu ke kulturnímu dědictví jiných kultur se ve středověkém myšlení objevují na nejrůznějších místech. \nSpolečně s hosty\, dr. Pavlínou Cermanovou z CMS FLÚ AV ČR\, dr. Ditou Válovou z ÚFAR FF UK a dr. Milanem Žoncou z FLÚ AV ČR\, se budeme zamýšlet nad dynamikou mezikulturního přenosu ve středověku a nad tím\, jak byl samotnými skupinami\, jež se ho účastnily\, vnímán či problematizován. Zaměříme se přitom na sféru\, jež v dnešních debatách chybí\, a to je přenos poznání. Prozkoumáme\, jak středověká arabská kultura přistupovala k antickému myšlenkovému dědictví\, na příkladu překladů pseudoaristotelského spisu Secretum secretorum prozkoumáme\, jak probíhala recepce arabské učenosti a podíváme se rovněž na to\, jakým způsobem vnímaly přejímání vědeckých a filozofických nauk cizího původu židovské komunity. Vnímali židovští učenci studium „cizí“ (tedy řecké\, arabské a latinské vědu) jako ohrožení\, nebo jako příležitost obohacení? Jakým způsobem bylo toto studium židovskými učenci ospravedlňováno nebo odsuzováno a jaké kroky podnikaly židovské komunity s cílem regulovat je? \nVšichni jsou vřele zváni nejen k účasti v publiku\, ale uvítáme samozřejmě rádi aktivní zájemce o diskusi na témata koncept vzdělání\, evropská kultura v židovské\, křesťanské i muslimské perspektivě\, vzdělanostní sítě a další. Těším se na setkání ve čtvrtek!
URL:https://medievista.cz/akce/o-konceptu-vedeni-a-jeho-prenosech-obohaceni-nebo-ohrozeni/
LOCATION:Jazz Republic\, Jilská 1\, Praha 1\, 11000\, Česká republika
CATEGORIES:Přednášky,Vše
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://medievista.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/fil_kavarna.png
ORGANIZER;CN="Filosofick%C3%BD %C3%BAstav Akademie v%C4%9Bd %C4%8CR":MAILTO:sekretariat@flu.cas.cz
GEO:50.0846124;14.4187828
X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION;VALUE=URI;X-ADDRESS=Jazz Republic Jilská 1 Praha 1 11000 Česká republika;X-APPLE-RADIUS=500;X-TITLE=Jilská 1:geo:14.4187828,50.0846124
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171005T170000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171005T170000
DTSTAMP:20260405T220351
CREATED:20170927T081322Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20170927T081322Z
UID:10001166-1507222800-1507222800@medievista.cz
SUMMARY:Unseasonal Winds of Love: Prostitution and the Foreign Community in Early Modern Nagasaki
DESCRIPTION:Venue: Celetná 20 (FF UK)\, Room 425 \nIs sex a vice or a need? In early modern Japan\, it was usually viewed as the latter. Therefore\, facilities were provided for the foreign traders who had to conduct business in Japan without the\ncompany of their own women. Prostitution took on distinctive characteristics in early modern Nagasaki as result of its unique clientele\, attributes that highlight shogunal attitudes toward sex and\nforeigners\, and reveal the importance of these women in the economy of Nagasaki and as conduits between cultures. \nMartha Chaiklin is Assistant Professor at Zayed University\, United Arab Emirates. She holds a PhD in History from Leiden University in the Netherlands and M.A. in Japanese History from Seijo University and M.A. in Asian Studies from University of Michigan. Author of books and articles on Japan and the East India Companies\, her most recent book is Ivory and the Aesthetics of Modernity in Meiji Japan (Palgrave\, 2014). She is also the editor of Mediated by Gifts: Politics and Society in Japan\, 1350–1850 (Brill\, 2016).
URL:https://medievista.cz/akce/unseasonal-winds-of-love-prostitution-and-the-foreign-community-in-early-modern-nagasaki/
LOCATION:Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Karlovy – Celetná\, Celetná 20\, Praha\, Česká republika
CATEGORIES:Přednášky,Vše
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://medievista.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/japan.png
GEO:50.0871649;14.4241896
X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION;VALUE=URI;X-ADDRESS=Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Karlovy – Celetná Celetná 20 Praha Česká republika;X-APPLE-RADIUS=500;X-TITLE=Celetná 20:geo:14.4241896,50.0871649
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171006T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171007T170000
DTSTAMP:20260405T220351
CREATED:20170927T080608Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20170927T080728Z
UID:10001165-1507280400-1507395600@medievista.cz
SUMMARY:III. Ročník kastellologické konference k poctě prof. Tomáš Durdíka
DESCRIPTION:PÁTEK 6. 10. 2017\n9.00-10.20\nPrezence účastníků\n10:20-10:30\nÚvodní slovo\n10:30-10:50\nFrantišek Gabriel / Luce Kursová: Hrad Škvorec\n11:00-11:20\nZlata Gersdorfová: Hrad Sychrov ne světle povrchového průzkumu\n11:30-11:50\nPetr Kastl: Šlechtická rezidence? Vojenská pevnost nebo zřícenina? Tři podoby\nstředověkého hradu v česko – bavorském pohraničí\n12:00-13:00\nOběd\n13:00-13:20\nVilém Knoll / Tomáš Karel: Kaple a kostely jako součást hradů na Chebsku\n13:30-13:50\nDavid Novák: Kastellologie a GIS. Jak se to rýmuje?\n14:00-14:20\nMiroslava Cejpová: Kuchyně na Pražském hradě\n14:30-14:50\nFilip Prekop / Erika Průchová: První výsledky archeologického výzkumu hradní kaple\nNavštívení Panny Marie v Bečově nad Teplou\n15:00-15:30\nStanislav Vohryzek: Možnosti studia moravské středověké šlechty a jejich sídel na základě\npísemných pramenů. Případová studie region Jemnicka\n15:40-16:00\nDaniel Kovář: Menší opevněná sídla v sídelní struktuře rožmberského dominia\n16:00-16.30\nPauza na kávu\n16:30-16:50\nPetr Chotěbor: Ludvíkovo křídlo starého královského paláce na Pražském hradě\n17:00-17:20\nJan Anderle: Hrady na Sušicku v době kolem poloviny 14. století\n17:30-17:50\nBogus Wasik / Marcin Wiewióra: Castra terrae culmensis – wyniki nowych badań zamków\nkrzyżackich w ziemi chełmińskiej (Unisław\, Starogród)\n18:00-18:20\nAleksander Andrzejewski /Jan Salm: Zamek w Pińczowie – z problematyki badań\,\nzabezpieczenia i ekspozycji reliktu\n18:30-18:50\nJiří Slavík: Hrady či městská opevnění ve východních Čechách (1400-1600)\n19:00\nVečeře\, diskuse \nSOBOTA 7. 10. 2017\n8.30-9:15\nSnídaně\n9:30-10:00\nVzpomínková pobožnost v kapli státního hradu Křivoklát\n10:00-10:30\nPauza na kávu\n10:30-10:50\nFrantišek Záruba: Karlswald\, zapomenutý hrad Karla IV?\n11:00-11:20\nMilan Sýkora: Archeologický výzkum hradu Kalich\n11:30-11:50\nMilan Procházka: Hrad Bjelaj. Příklad osmanské adaptace\, nebo aplikace středoevropské\npředsunuté fortifikace?\n12:00-12:20\nLuboš Hobl: Hrad Vrtba a jeho zázemí\n12:30-12:50\n12:50-13:00\nJosef Hložek / Michal Větrovec: Hrad u Strašína v kontextu české hradní architektury\nSlovo závěrem\n13:00\nOběd\n14:30-16:00\nExkurze – hrad Křivoklát
URL:https://medievista.cz/akce/iii-rocnik-kastellologicke-konference-k-pocte-prof-tomas-durdika/
LOCATION:Křivoklát\, Křivoklát 47\, Česká republika
CATEGORIES:Konference a semináře,Vše
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://medievista.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Krivoklat2017.png
GEO:50.0376417;13.8724605
X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION;VALUE=URI;X-ADDRESS=Křivoklát Křivoklát 47 Česká republika;X-APPLE-RADIUS=500;X-TITLE=Křivoklát 47:geo:13.8724605,50.0376417
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171006T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171006T170000
DTSTAMP:20260405T220351
CREATED:20171003T063043Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20171003T063043Z
UID:10001168-1507298400-1507309200@medievista.cz
SUMMARY:LVII. medievistický pátek
DESCRIPTION:Dr. Anne Katrin Kunde\n(EDITIO – édition de textes de l’histoire médiévale luxembourgeoise\, Université du Luxembourg)\nBeobachtungen zu den Urkunden\n Johanns des Blinden aus dem Landeshauptarchiv Koblenz \nDr. Eloise Adde-Vomacka\n(Identités. Politiques\, Sociétés\, Espaces\, Faculté des Lettres\, des Sciences Humaines\, des Arts et des Sciences de l’Education\, Université du Luxembourg)\nA Foreign King in Bohemia: The Modalities of the Political Communication between John the Blind and the Bohemian Nobility (1310-1318) \nMgr. Christa Dönges-Birkel\n(Identités. Politiques\, Sociétés\, Espaces\, Faculté des Lettres\, des Sciences Humaines\, des Arts et des Sciences de l’Education\, Université du Luxembourg)\nLa dame n’y est pas obeye. The Possibilities and Limitations of Female Rule in the Fifteenth-Century Duchy of Luxembourg: The Case of Elisabeth of Görlitz\, Lien Holder of Luxembourg 1411-1442
URL:https://medievista.cz/akce/lvii-medievisticky-patek/
LOCATION:Filozofická fakulta Masarykovy univerzity\, Arna Nováka 1\, Brno\, 60200
CATEGORIES:Přednášky,Vše
ORGANIZER;CN="%C3%9Astav PVH a archivnictv%C3%AD Filozofick%C3%A9 fakulty Masarykovy univerzity":MAILTO:wpvh@phil.muni.cz
GEO:49.2005491;16.5983999
X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION;VALUE=URI;X-ADDRESS=Filozofická fakulta Masarykovy univerzity Arna Nováka 1 Brno 60200;X-APPLE-RADIUS=500;X-TITLE=Arna Nováka 1:geo:16.5983999,49.2005491
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20171010
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20171012
DTSTAMP:20260405T220351
CREATED:20171005T075405Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20171005T080105Z
UID:10001184-1507593600-1507766399@medievista.cz
SUMMARY:Město a jeho hradby
DESCRIPTION:36. mezinárodní konference Archivu hlavního města Prahy ve spolupráci s Historickým ústavem Akademie věd ČR\, Fakultou humanitních studií Univerzity Karlovy v Praze a Katedrou historie Filozofické fakulty Univerzity J. E. Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem. \n36. internationale Tagung des Archivs der Hauptstadt Prag in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Institut für Geschichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften der Tschechischen Republik\, der Fakultät für Humanistische Studien der Karls-Universität und dem Lehrstuhl für Geschichte der Philosophischen Fakultät der J. E. Purkyně-Universität in Ústí nad Labem. \nProgram: http://www.ahmp.cz/page/docs/e-PROGRAM2017.pdf \n  \n 
URL:https://medievista.cz/akce/mesto-a-jeho-hradby/
LOCATION:Archiv hlavního města Prahy – Clam-Gallasův palác\, Husova 20\, Praha 1\, 11000\, Česká republika
CATEGORIES:Konference a semináře,Vše
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://medievista.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/mestoahradby.png
ORGANIZER;CN="Archiv hlavn%C3%ADho m%C4%9Bsta Prahy":MAILTO:posta@praha.eu
GEO:50.0864255;14.4177983
X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION;VALUE=URI;X-ADDRESS=Archiv hlavního města Prahy – Clam-Gallasův palác Husova 20 Praha 1 11000 Česká republika;X-APPLE-RADIUS=500;X-TITLE=Husova 20:geo:14.4177983,50.0864255
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171011T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171011T190000
DTSTAMP:20260405T220351
CREATED:20171003T063752Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20171009T090206Z
UID:10001170-1507743000-1507748400@medievista.cz
SUMMARY:Digital Humanities and the Study of the Past
DESCRIPTION:The guest lecture series Digital Humanities and the Study of the Past (part of the Medieval Social Conflicts and Contrasts project) attempts to bring scholars working in the emerging field of Digital Humanities with the focus on Medieval or Early Modern topics to both local and international audience at the Faculty of Arts\, Charles University\, Prague. We hope to cover a number of a wide field of approaches and angles through presentations of successful digital projects or notable works in progress. \nThe 2017/18 Winter Term is convened by: Ondřej Tichý \nCourse material and student requirements are specified in Moodle\, SIS Code: AAA500153 (local students)\, AAA500153E (Erasmus students) \nProgramme / Syllabus at https://css.ff.cuni.cz/en/lecture-series-medieval-conflicts-and-contrasts/the-digital-methodologies-in-the-study-of-the-past/ \n\n\n4 October: Daniel Bradley\, Molecular Population Genetics Lab\, Trinity College\, Dublin\n\n\n\nBooks\, Bones and Genomes: DNA analysis of parchments and archaeological remains\n\nBy comparing genomes from ancient animals and humans we can uncover new information about the past.  This is a golden age of ancient DNA. Knowledge of those materials which preserve DNA best such as parchments or particularly dense mammalian bones\, coupled with new sequencing technologies\, has enabled us to retrieve whole genomes from the past on a routine basis.  This has allowed us\, for example\, to add a dimension to the material study of ancient manuscripts and to infer the major population transitions in European prehistory\, placing migration firmly back as a central theme in understanding cultural change. \nReferences: \n\nGenomic signals of migration and continuity in Britain before the Anglo-Saxons. Martiniano R\, et al Nat Commun. 2016 Jan 19;7:10326. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10326.\nNeolithic and Bronze Age migration to Ireland and establishment of the insular Atlantic genome. Cassidy LM\, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 12;113(2):368-73. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518445113. Epub 2015 Dec 28.\nThe York Gospels: a one thousand year biological  palimpsest    Matthew D. Teasdale et al. 2017 BiorXiv  doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/146324.\nUpper Palaeolithic genomes reveal deep roots of modern Eurasians. Jones ER\, et al. Nat Commun. 2015 Nov 16;6:8912. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9912.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n11 October: Michael Pidd\, Director of The Digital Humanities Institute\, University of Sheffield\n\n\n\nManuscripts\, Models\, and Ownership: Bringing Data Together\n\nConnected Histories (http://www.connectedhistories.org) and its sister site Manuscripts Online (http://www.manuscriptsonline.org) enable users to undertake structured searches across many distributed online historical datasets. The combined resources equate to approximately 30 billion data records. The aim was to realise the dream that mutliple datasets can be brought together in one place and combined to create new knowledge\, but the process of doing this was challenging due to the nature of the datasets themselves: strange transcriptions; weird data models; and restrictive ownership. In this talk I will explore the difficulties of developing research resources for historical and literary studies that use multiple datasets\, and show some of the computational (and human!) solutions for addressing these problems. Examples will be taken from the following DHI projects: Manuscripts Online\, Connected Histories\, Intoxicants and Early Modernity\, and Digital Panopticon. The talk will also introduce the following technologies and methods for non-experts: data capture\, data modelling\, licensing\, data visualisation\, natural language processing\, and nominal record linkage. \n\n\n\n\n\n18 October: Reading Week (No Lecture)\n\n\n\n\n\n25 October: Marjorie Burghart\, Centre national de la recherche scientifique\, Lyon\n\n\n\nDigital Editions and the TEI standard for DH\nAbstract coming soon…\n\n\n\n\n1 November: Brittany Schorn\, Department of Anglo-Saxon\, Norse and Celtic\, University of Cambridge\n\n\n\nGersum: Identifying Old Norse lexis in the Poetry of the Alliterative Revival\n\nThe study of the rich and diverse Old Norse influence on the medieval English lexicon is very challenging\, not least etymologically: given the genetic proximity of the languages in contact\, it can be extremely difficult to identify which English words really do show input from Old Norse. In recent years there has been intensive etymological and contextual work on the Norse-derived vocabulary of some texts and traditions\, especially before c. 1300 (see esp. Pons-Sanz 2007\, 2013; Dance 2003\, 2011).  Nevertheless\, the Scandinavian influence on the vocabulary of the great later Middle English literary monuments has rarely seen sustained exploration\, and texts composed in the north and east of England\, where the influence from Old Norse is attested in its greatest range and complexity\, have not been treated together in a major\, etymologically analytical study since Björkman’s survey of 1900–2. \nIn this paper\, I shall describe the new methodological framework developed for the Gersum Project (a three-year project\, begun in January 2016 and funded by the U.K.’s Arts and Humanities Research Council; see www.gersum.org) which is undertaking a detailed study of the etymologies of c. 1600 words for which Old Norse input has been claimed\, by means of a searchable online database. \nWorks Cited \nBjörkman\, E.\, Scandinavian Loan-Words in Middle English\, 2 vols.\, Studien zur englischen Philologie 7\, 11 (Halle\, 1900–2) \nDance\, R.\, Words Derived from Old Norse in Early Middle English: Studies in the Vocabulary of the South-West Midland Texts\, Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies 246 (Tempe\, AZ\, 2003) \n———\, ‘“Tomarȝan hit is awane”: Words Derived from Old Norse in Four Lambeth Homilies’\, in Foreign Influences on Medieval English\, ed. J. Fisiak and M. Bator\, Studies in English Medieval Language and Literature 28 (Frankfurt am Main\, 2011)\, pp. 77–127 \nPons-Sanz\, S. M.\, Norse-Derived Vocabulary in Late Old English Texts: Wulfstan’s Works\, a Case Study\, NOWELE Supplement Series 22 (Odense\, 2007) \n———\, The Lexical Effects of Anglo-Scandinavian Linguistic Contact on Old English\, Studies in the Early Middle Ages 1 (Turnhout\, 2013) \nTownend\, M.\, Language and History in Viking Age England: Linguistic Relations Between Speakers of Old Norse and Old English\, Studies in the Early Middle Ages 6 (Turnhout\, 2002) \n\n\n\n\n\n8 November: Kerstin Majewski\, Instituts für Englische Philologie\, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München\n\n\n\nThe Runes Project & The Reconstruction of the Runes on the Ruthwell Cross\n\nThis paper introduces the research project RuneS and deals in detail with one of its doctoral theses. \nThe research project “Runic writing in the Germanic languages (RuneS)”\, funded by the Union of the German Academies of Sciences and based at the Goettingen Academy of Sciences and Humanities\, includes three research units\, at the universities of Kiel\, Goettingen\, and Eichstätt-Munich. The project analyzes the runic script as a writing system within its historico-cultural context. It especially focuses on phonemic\, graphemic and text-pragmatic aspects\, in particular on investigating the relationship between runic and Latin writing. \nThe doctoral thesis The Reconstruction of the Runic Text on the Ruthwell Cross has grown out of the Eichstätt-Munich research group. It deals with the longest inscription in Old English runes\, which is carved on two panels of the 8th ct. Ruthwell Cross ‒ a Christian stone-cross now located in Dumfries and Galloway\, Scotland. The inscription is comprised of a four stanza poem written in an early Northumbrian dialect. The poem narrates the crucifixion episode from a unique point of view: the cross is the speaker. \nThe thesis attempts to reconstruct the Ruthwell Crucifixion Poem. With one third of the runes illegible\, a restoration of the text proves to be difficult. What is more\, in some instances even the remaining runes have encouraged scholarly debate. For example\, the Old English word rōdi ‘rod’\, referring to Christ’s cross\, shows an unusal i-ending; recently\, the form stemn ‘stem (of a tree)’ has been suggested instead\, considering rōdi a mistake by the carver/designer. The present paper discusses the use of Old English rōd ‘rod; cross’ and gealga ‘gallows; cross’ written on the Ruthwell Cross through a comparative analysis of the runic poem with contemporary religious texts in Latin and Old English. \n\n \nThe Ruthwell Cross\, West Face (Majewski 2012) \n\n\n \nThe Ruthwell Cross\, East Face (Majewski 2012) \n\n\n\n\n\n\n15 November (in Czech): Boris Lehečka\, Institute of Czech Language\, Czech Academy of Sciences\, Prague\n\n\n\nDigital and analog humanities: one or two worlds?\n\nPřednáška představí na příkladu diachronní bohemistiky názory klasických\, „analogových“ lingvistů na možnosti využití digitálních technologií při jejich práci\, a to z pohledu počítačového odborníka\, který se snaží prosazovat moderní technologie v tomto oboru od počátku 21. století. Výsledkem společného úsilí jsou zejména stránky Vokabulář webový (http://vokabular.ujc.cas.cz). Přednášející se pokusí hledat cestu\, jak analogové a digitální humanitní vědy sbližovat. \nIllustrated by the example of diachronic Czech studies\, the lecture will present the ideas of the classical “analog” linguists concerning of using digital technologies in their work. These ideas will be reflected from the point of view of a computer expert who has been striving to promote modern technologies in this field from the beginning of the 21st Century. The web site Vokabulář webový (Web Vocabulary; http://vokabular.ujc.cas.cz) represents a good example of such a joint effort. The presenter will focus on finding paths towards convergence of the analog and digital humanities. \n\n\n\n\n\n22 November: Franz Fischer\, Cologne Center for eHumanities\, Universität zu Köln\n\n\n\nPeople from the Past – Saint Patrick\, the Emperor and Pessoa through their Writings\n\nIn my talk\, I am going to present a wide range of digital edition projects I am involved in as an editor and collaborator at the Cologne Center for eHumanities. A focus will be on the methodologies applied in order to find answers to the old and fundamental question of what famous people of the past actually wrote. What do we really know about Patrick\, the patron Saint of Ireland? What did the original decrees of early medieval emperors and rulers look like? What did Magister Guillelmus actually teach to his students in the early days of the Parisian university? What is the nature of the ingenious and chimerical work of the Portuguese poet Fernando Pessoa? How did the virtuous Swiss writer Hermann Burger create his first novel? How did the great German sociologist Niklas Luhmann develop his systems theory in practical terms? \n\n\n\n\n\n29 November: Catherine Richardson\, Centre for Medieval and Early Modern Studies (School of English)\, University of Kent\n\n\n\nEarly modern English domestic interiors – digital methods\n\nThe early modern English household was central to early modern life – the foundational space of social\, economic\, religious and political cultures. It was not\, of course\, just a family matter: it was seen as crucial for the maintenance of early modern social order\, as household heads were responsible for their families\, servants and apprentices. Actions within the household were therefore foundational to the formation of status and gendered identity\, but also had wide political consequences – they mattered greatly in early modern England. The wider project from which this paper comes seeks to understand domestic experience – what it felt like to live in such a household\, and what defined the connections between spaces\, objects and human activity. \nThe paper surveys the digital methods by which we have explored the structuring of domestic experience\, including mobile eye-tracking\, 3D scanning and room reconstruction of various kinds\, and time-lapse photography. It investigates the benefits and frustrations of these methods for addressing such questions as: how were behaviours located within an evolving domestic material environment? How were lifestyles formed day by day\, hour by hour? Finally\, in conclusion\, it aims to imagine what other digital possibilities there might be for exploring and representing domestic experience in the future\, and what questions they may be able to address. \n  \n\n\n\n\n\n6 December: Jenny Benham\, School of History\, Archaeology and Religion\, Cardiff University\n\n\n\nEarly English Laws Project\n\nAbstract coming soon… \nhttp://www.earlyenglishlaws.ac.uk/ \n\n\n\n\n\n13 December: Tuomas Heikkilä\, Faculty of Theology\, University of Helsinki\n\n\n\nManuscripts and Computers: Exploring Medieval Textual Traditions (Stemmatology)\n\nPast decades have experienced the rise of new\, innovative methods within the field of textual scholarship. Philologists and historians have found new friends in computer scientists\, evolutionary biologists\, statisticians\, and mathematicians\, for instance\, and the humanities are now eagerly cooperating with the sciences. \nThe lecture explores and illustrates some fresh approaches\, new possibilities and computerized tools designed for studying ancient and medieval textual traditions. What is the current status quo of the field? How can the novel methods help the scholar of old texts in establishing the critical text\, and in studying the cultural history of a textual tradition? \n\n\n\n\n\n20 December: David Novák\, Institute of Acrheology\, Czech Academy of Sciences\n\n\n\nGeographic Information Systems in Archeology\n\nArchaeology is a field of research highly interconnected with the spatial information. Therefore in 1990s\, introduction of the GIS brought rapid development in the archaeological methods and theory\, esp. concerning landscape archaeology\, documentation techniques and spatial analysis. Lecture will provide general overview of the possible applications of the GIS in archaeology; in higher detail\, it will stress importance of the digital tools for landscape research (spatial relations\, remote sensing\, geomorphometry) and for the building of common knowledge base (predictive modelling; digital infrastructures). \nResources: \nGojda\, M. – John\, J. (eds.) 2013: Archaeology and Airborne Laser Scanning of the Landscape. Plzeň. \nHengl\, T. – Reuter\, H.I. (eds.) 2009: Geomorphometry: Concepts\, Software\, Applications. Amsterdam. \nKuna a kol. 2015: Structuring archaeological evidence: The Archaeological Map of the Czech Republic and related information systems. Prague. \nKuna\, M. et al. 2004: Nedestruktivní archeologie. Teorie\, metody a cíle. [Non-destructive archaeology. Theory\, methods and goals]. Praha. \nvan Leusen\, M. 2002: Pattern to Process: Methodological Investigations into the Formation and Interpretation of Spatial Patterns in Archaeological Landscapes. Utrecht. \nWheatley\, D. – Gillings\, M. 2002: Spatial Technology and Archaeology: The archaeological applications of GIS. London – New York. \nhttp://www.aiscr.cz/en/ – Archaeological Information System of the Czech Republic \n\n\n\n\n\n3 January: Final Essay
URL:https://medievista.cz/akce/digital-humanities-and-the-study-of-the-past/2017-10-11/
LOCATION:Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Karlovy – Hybernská 3\, Hybernská 3\, Praha 1\, 11800
CATEGORIES:Doktorandské,Periodické,Přednášky,Vše
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://medievista.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/banner_web.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20171012
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20171014
DTSTAMP:20260405T220351
CREATED:20171005T074623Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20171005T074623Z
UID:10001182-1507766400-1507939199@medievista.cz
SUMMARY:Wielkie murowanie. Zamki w Polsce za Kazimierza Wielkiego
DESCRIPTION:Kolejne sympozjum z cyklu Colloquia Castrensia poświęcone będzie zagadnieniu budownictwa obronnego okresu kazimierzowskiego. Rządy ostatniego koronowanego władcy piastowskiego – Kazimierza III Wielkiego –charakteryzowały się niezwykłą dynamiką w zakresie budownictwa militarnego. Ten ogromny wysiłek inwestycyjny docenili zarówno kronikarze\, jak i współcześni badacze. Obszerna literatura dotycząca tego zagadnienia nie wyczerpuje wielu ważnych wątków\, które pozostają niezbadane. \nZamiarem organizatorów jest zachęcenie do zaprezentowania wyników swoich badań przedstawicieli różnych dyscyplin\, w tym przede wszystkim badaczy zajmujących się dziedziną zwaną kastellologią. Mamy nadzieję\, iż przedstawienie na forum naukowym wyników szczegółowych kwerend źródłowych i rezultatów najnowszych badań archeologiczno-architektonicznych przyczyni się do dokonania nowych istotnych ustaleń. Serdecznie zapraszamy osoby z kręgu akademickiego i muzealniczego\, a także wszystkich zainteresowanych archeologią\, historią czy historią sztuki. \nEfektem debat konferencyjnych będzie publikacja artykułów naukowych w formie monografii pokonferencyjnej. \nUdział w konferencji jest bezpłatny. \nZamek Królewski w Warszawie – Muzeum. Rezydencja Królów i Rzeczypospolitej\nMiejsce obrad: Zamek Królewski w Warszawie\, Sala Koncertowa \nDzień pierwszy\, 12 października\n9.00–9.30 otwarcie\ndr. hab. Przemysław Mrozowski\n………………………………………………\n9.30–11.00 Panel 1\n1. prof. Sławomir Gawlas\nZamki jako element organizacji królewskiej domeny w czasach Kazimierza Wielkiego\n2. dr hab. Stanisław Kołodziejski\nZamki kazimierzowskie w ziemi krakowskiej\n3. dr Piotr Lasek\nZamki prywatne w czasach Kazimierza Wielkiego\n10.50–11.30 Dyskusja \n11.30–12.00 Przerwa kawowa \n12.00–13.40 Panel 2\n1. dr hab. Janusz Pietrzak\nZamki i dwory Jarosława Bogorii ze Skotnik\n2. Tomasz Olszacki\nZ badań nad rozwojem wybranych późnośredniowiecznych rezydencji królewskich na ziemi sandomierskiej i obszarach pogranicznych. Od Kazimierza Wielkiego po Władysława Jagiełłę\n3. dr Tomasz Dzieńkowski\nBurzliwy wiek XIV na pograniczu wschodnim. Budownictwo obronne ziemi lubelskiej i chełmskiej (część zachodnia) w źródłach archeologicznych\n13.15–13.40 Dyskusja \n13.40–14.40 PRZERWA (lunch dla prelegentów i zaproszonych gości) \n14.40–16.30 Panel 3\n1. prof. dr hab. Małgorzata Chorowska\nPanorama architektoniczna zamków dolnośląskich około połowy XIV stulecia\n2. dr Przemysław Nocuń\nWieża mieszkalna Henryka I jaworskiego w Siedlęcinie w świetle dotychczasowych badań\n3. dr inż. Andrzej Legendziewicz\nDwie wieże – zamek w Koźlu od schyłku XIII do początków XV w.\n15.55–16.30 Dyskusja \n17.00 Uroczysta kolacja \nDzień drugi\, 13 października\n10.00–11.45 Panel 1\n1. dr Tomasz Ratajczak\n„Ozdobił zamek krakowski podziwu godnymi domami” – kazimierzowska rozbudowa zamku królewskiego na Wawelu\n2. Tomasz Olszacki\nZamki w Pyzdrach i Szydłowie – rezydencje obronne Kazimierza Wielkiego i jego następców w świetle badań archeologiczno-architektonicznych oraz analizy źródeł pisanych\n3. dr Czesław Hadamik\nNierozwiązany problem – zamek Olsztyn w czasach Kazimierza Wielkiego \n11.15–11.45 Dyskusja \n11.45–12.15 Przerwa kawowa \n12.15–14.00 Panel 2 \n1. Artur Ginter\nDomniemany zamek Kazimierza Wielkiego w Muszynie w świetle najnowszych badań archeologiczno-architektonicznych\n2. dr Maciej Małachowicz\nWyniki badań architektonicznych zamku w Kruszwicy\n3. dr Czesław Lasota\, dr Maciej Małachowicz\nZamek w Namysłowie. Przygranicze Korony Czeskiej i Królestwa Polskiego\n13.30–14.00 Dyskusja\nPodsumowanie i zakończenie konferencji\n14.00–15.00 lunch dla prelegentów i zaproszonych gości
URL:https://medievista.cz/akce/wielkie-murowanie-zamki-w-polsce-za-kazimierza-wielkiego/
LOCATION:Zamek Królewski w Warszawie\, plac Zamkowy 4\, Warszawa\, Polsko\, 00-277
CATEGORIES:Konference a semináře,Vše
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://medievista.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/wielkie-murowanie.png
ORGANIZER;CN="Zamek Kr%C3%B3lewski w Warszawie %E2%80%93 Muzeum. Rezydencja Kr%C3%B3l%C3%B3w i Rzeczypospolitej":MAILTO:protokol@zamek-krolewski.pl
GEO:52.247707;21.014162
X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION;VALUE=URI;X-ADDRESS=Zamek Królewski w Warszawie plac Zamkowy 4 Warszawa Polsko 00-277;X-APPLE-RADIUS=500;X-TITLE=plac Zamkowy 4:geo:21.014162,52.247707
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171018T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171018T190000
DTSTAMP:20260405T220351
CREATED:20171003T063752Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20171009T090206Z
UID:10001171-1508347800-1508353200@medievista.cz
SUMMARY:Digital Humanities and the Study of the Past
DESCRIPTION:The guest lecture series Digital Humanities and the Study of the Past (part of the Medieval Social Conflicts and Contrasts project) attempts to bring scholars working in the emerging field of Digital Humanities with the focus on Medieval or Early Modern topics to both local and international audience at the Faculty of Arts\, Charles University\, Prague. We hope to cover a number of a wide field of approaches and angles through presentations of successful digital projects or notable works in progress. \nThe 2017/18 Winter Term is convened by: Ondřej Tichý \nCourse material and student requirements are specified in Moodle\, SIS Code: AAA500153 (local students)\, AAA500153E (Erasmus students) \nProgramme / Syllabus at https://css.ff.cuni.cz/en/lecture-series-medieval-conflicts-and-contrasts/the-digital-methodologies-in-the-study-of-the-past/ \n\n\n4 October: Daniel Bradley\, Molecular Population Genetics Lab\, Trinity College\, Dublin\n\n\n\nBooks\, Bones and Genomes: DNA analysis of parchments and archaeological remains\n\nBy comparing genomes from ancient animals and humans we can uncover new information about the past.  This is a golden age of ancient DNA. Knowledge of those materials which preserve DNA best such as parchments or particularly dense mammalian bones\, coupled with new sequencing technologies\, has enabled us to retrieve whole genomes from the past on a routine basis.  This has allowed us\, for example\, to add a dimension to the material study of ancient manuscripts and to infer the major population transitions in European prehistory\, placing migration firmly back as a central theme in understanding cultural change. \nReferences: \n\nGenomic signals of migration and continuity in Britain before the Anglo-Saxons. Martiniano R\, et al Nat Commun. 2016 Jan 19;7:10326. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10326.\nNeolithic and Bronze Age migration to Ireland and establishment of the insular Atlantic genome. Cassidy LM\, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 12;113(2):368-73. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518445113. Epub 2015 Dec 28.\nThe York Gospels: a one thousand year biological  palimpsest    Matthew D. Teasdale et al. 2017 BiorXiv  doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/146324.\nUpper Palaeolithic genomes reveal deep roots of modern Eurasians. Jones ER\, et al. Nat Commun. 2015 Nov 16;6:8912. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9912.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n11 October: Michael Pidd\, Director of The Digital Humanities Institute\, University of Sheffield\n\n\n\nManuscripts\, Models\, and Ownership: Bringing Data Together\n\nConnected Histories (http://www.connectedhistories.org) and its sister site Manuscripts Online (http://www.manuscriptsonline.org) enable users to undertake structured searches across many distributed online historical datasets. The combined resources equate to approximately 30 billion data records. The aim was to realise the dream that mutliple datasets can be brought together in one place and combined to create new knowledge\, but the process of doing this was challenging due to the nature of the datasets themselves: strange transcriptions; weird data models; and restrictive ownership. In this talk I will explore the difficulties of developing research resources for historical and literary studies that use multiple datasets\, and show some of the computational (and human!) solutions for addressing these problems. Examples will be taken from the following DHI projects: Manuscripts Online\, Connected Histories\, Intoxicants and Early Modernity\, and Digital Panopticon. The talk will also introduce the following technologies and methods for non-experts: data capture\, data modelling\, licensing\, data visualisation\, natural language processing\, and nominal record linkage. \n\n\n\n\n\n18 October: Reading Week (No Lecture)\n\n\n\n\n\n25 October: Marjorie Burghart\, Centre national de la recherche scientifique\, Lyon\n\n\n\nDigital Editions and the TEI standard for DH\nAbstract coming soon…\n\n\n\n\n1 November: Brittany Schorn\, Department of Anglo-Saxon\, Norse and Celtic\, University of Cambridge\n\n\n\nGersum: Identifying Old Norse lexis in the Poetry of the Alliterative Revival\n\nThe study of the rich and diverse Old Norse influence on the medieval English lexicon is very challenging\, not least etymologically: given the genetic proximity of the languages in contact\, it can be extremely difficult to identify which English words really do show input from Old Norse. In recent years there has been intensive etymological and contextual work on the Norse-derived vocabulary of some texts and traditions\, especially before c. 1300 (see esp. Pons-Sanz 2007\, 2013; Dance 2003\, 2011).  Nevertheless\, the Scandinavian influence on the vocabulary of the great later Middle English literary monuments has rarely seen sustained exploration\, and texts composed in the north and east of England\, where the influence from Old Norse is attested in its greatest range and complexity\, have not been treated together in a major\, etymologically analytical study since Björkman’s survey of 1900–2. \nIn this paper\, I shall describe the new methodological framework developed for the Gersum Project (a three-year project\, begun in January 2016 and funded by the U.K.’s Arts and Humanities Research Council; see www.gersum.org) which is undertaking a detailed study of the etymologies of c. 1600 words for which Old Norse input has been claimed\, by means of a searchable online database. \nWorks Cited \nBjörkman\, E.\, Scandinavian Loan-Words in Middle English\, 2 vols.\, Studien zur englischen Philologie 7\, 11 (Halle\, 1900–2) \nDance\, R.\, Words Derived from Old Norse in Early Middle English: Studies in the Vocabulary of the South-West Midland Texts\, Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies 246 (Tempe\, AZ\, 2003) \n———\, ‘“Tomarȝan hit is awane”: Words Derived from Old Norse in Four Lambeth Homilies’\, in Foreign Influences on Medieval English\, ed. J. Fisiak and M. Bator\, Studies in English Medieval Language and Literature 28 (Frankfurt am Main\, 2011)\, pp. 77–127 \nPons-Sanz\, S. M.\, Norse-Derived Vocabulary in Late Old English Texts: Wulfstan’s Works\, a Case Study\, NOWELE Supplement Series 22 (Odense\, 2007) \n———\, The Lexical Effects of Anglo-Scandinavian Linguistic Contact on Old English\, Studies in the Early Middle Ages 1 (Turnhout\, 2013) \nTownend\, M.\, Language and History in Viking Age England: Linguistic Relations Between Speakers of Old Norse and Old English\, Studies in the Early Middle Ages 6 (Turnhout\, 2002) \n\n\n\n\n\n8 November: Kerstin Majewski\, Instituts für Englische Philologie\, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München\n\n\n\nThe Runes Project & The Reconstruction of the Runes on the Ruthwell Cross\n\nThis paper introduces the research project RuneS and deals in detail with one of its doctoral theses. \nThe research project “Runic writing in the Germanic languages (RuneS)”\, funded by the Union of the German Academies of Sciences and based at the Goettingen Academy of Sciences and Humanities\, includes three research units\, at the universities of Kiel\, Goettingen\, and Eichstätt-Munich. The project analyzes the runic script as a writing system within its historico-cultural context. It especially focuses on phonemic\, graphemic and text-pragmatic aspects\, in particular on investigating the relationship between runic and Latin writing. \nThe doctoral thesis The Reconstruction of the Runic Text on the Ruthwell Cross has grown out of the Eichstätt-Munich research group. It deals with the longest inscription in Old English runes\, which is carved on two panels of the 8th ct. Ruthwell Cross ‒ a Christian stone-cross now located in Dumfries and Galloway\, Scotland. The inscription is comprised of a four stanza poem written in an early Northumbrian dialect. The poem narrates the crucifixion episode from a unique point of view: the cross is the speaker. \nThe thesis attempts to reconstruct the Ruthwell Crucifixion Poem. With one third of the runes illegible\, a restoration of the text proves to be difficult. What is more\, in some instances even the remaining runes have encouraged scholarly debate. For example\, the Old English word rōdi ‘rod’\, referring to Christ’s cross\, shows an unusal i-ending; recently\, the form stemn ‘stem (of a tree)’ has been suggested instead\, considering rōdi a mistake by the carver/designer. The present paper discusses the use of Old English rōd ‘rod; cross’ and gealga ‘gallows; cross’ written on the Ruthwell Cross through a comparative analysis of the runic poem with contemporary religious texts in Latin and Old English. \n\n \nThe Ruthwell Cross\, West Face (Majewski 2012) \n\n\n \nThe Ruthwell Cross\, East Face (Majewski 2012) \n\n\n\n\n\n\n15 November (in Czech): Boris Lehečka\, Institute of Czech Language\, Czech Academy of Sciences\, Prague\n\n\n\nDigital and analog humanities: one or two worlds?\n\nPřednáška představí na příkladu diachronní bohemistiky názory klasických\, „analogových“ lingvistů na možnosti využití digitálních technologií při jejich práci\, a to z pohledu počítačového odborníka\, který se snaží prosazovat moderní technologie v tomto oboru od počátku 21. století. Výsledkem společného úsilí jsou zejména stránky Vokabulář webový (http://vokabular.ujc.cas.cz). Přednášející se pokusí hledat cestu\, jak analogové a digitální humanitní vědy sbližovat. \nIllustrated by the example of diachronic Czech studies\, the lecture will present the ideas of the classical “analog” linguists concerning of using digital technologies in their work. These ideas will be reflected from the point of view of a computer expert who has been striving to promote modern technologies in this field from the beginning of the 21st Century. The web site Vokabulář webový (Web Vocabulary; http://vokabular.ujc.cas.cz) represents a good example of such a joint effort. The presenter will focus on finding paths towards convergence of the analog and digital humanities. \n\n\n\n\n\n22 November: Franz Fischer\, Cologne Center for eHumanities\, Universität zu Köln\n\n\n\nPeople from the Past – Saint Patrick\, the Emperor and Pessoa through their Writings\n\nIn my talk\, I am going to present a wide range of digital edition projects I am involved in as an editor and collaborator at the Cologne Center for eHumanities. A focus will be on the methodologies applied in order to find answers to the old and fundamental question of what famous people of the past actually wrote. What do we really know about Patrick\, the patron Saint of Ireland? What did the original decrees of early medieval emperors and rulers look like? What did Magister Guillelmus actually teach to his students in the early days of the Parisian university? What is the nature of the ingenious and chimerical work of the Portuguese poet Fernando Pessoa? How did the virtuous Swiss writer Hermann Burger create his first novel? How did the great German sociologist Niklas Luhmann develop his systems theory in practical terms? \n\n\n\n\n\n29 November: Catherine Richardson\, Centre for Medieval and Early Modern Studies (School of English)\, University of Kent\n\n\n\nEarly modern English domestic interiors – digital methods\n\nThe early modern English household was central to early modern life – the foundational space of social\, economic\, religious and political cultures. It was not\, of course\, just a family matter: it was seen as crucial for the maintenance of early modern social order\, as household heads were responsible for their families\, servants and apprentices. Actions within the household were therefore foundational to the formation of status and gendered identity\, but also had wide political consequences – they mattered greatly in early modern England. The wider project from which this paper comes seeks to understand domestic experience – what it felt like to live in such a household\, and what defined the connections between spaces\, objects and human activity. \nThe paper surveys the digital methods by which we have explored the structuring of domestic experience\, including mobile eye-tracking\, 3D scanning and room reconstruction of various kinds\, and time-lapse photography. It investigates the benefits and frustrations of these methods for addressing such questions as: how were behaviours located within an evolving domestic material environment? How were lifestyles formed day by day\, hour by hour? Finally\, in conclusion\, it aims to imagine what other digital possibilities there might be for exploring and representing domestic experience in the future\, and what questions they may be able to address. \n  \n\n\n\n\n\n6 December: Jenny Benham\, School of History\, Archaeology and Religion\, Cardiff University\n\n\n\nEarly English Laws Project\n\nAbstract coming soon… \nhttp://www.earlyenglishlaws.ac.uk/ \n\n\n\n\n\n13 December: Tuomas Heikkilä\, Faculty of Theology\, University of Helsinki\n\n\n\nManuscripts and Computers: Exploring Medieval Textual Traditions (Stemmatology)\n\nPast decades have experienced the rise of new\, innovative methods within the field of textual scholarship. Philologists and historians have found new friends in computer scientists\, evolutionary biologists\, statisticians\, and mathematicians\, for instance\, and the humanities are now eagerly cooperating with the sciences. \nThe lecture explores and illustrates some fresh approaches\, new possibilities and computerized tools designed for studying ancient and medieval textual traditions. What is the current status quo of the field? How can the novel methods help the scholar of old texts in establishing the critical text\, and in studying the cultural history of a textual tradition? \n\n\n\n\n\n20 December: David Novák\, Institute of Acrheology\, Czech Academy of Sciences\n\n\n\nGeographic Information Systems in Archeology\n\nArchaeology is a field of research highly interconnected with the spatial information. Therefore in 1990s\, introduction of the GIS brought rapid development in the archaeological methods and theory\, esp. concerning landscape archaeology\, documentation techniques and spatial analysis. Lecture will provide general overview of the possible applications of the GIS in archaeology; in higher detail\, it will stress importance of the digital tools for landscape research (spatial relations\, remote sensing\, geomorphometry) and for the building of common knowledge base (predictive modelling; digital infrastructures). \nResources: \nGojda\, M. – John\, J. (eds.) 2013: Archaeology and Airborne Laser Scanning of the Landscape. Plzeň. \nHengl\, T. – Reuter\, H.I. (eds.) 2009: Geomorphometry: Concepts\, Software\, Applications. Amsterdam. \nKuna a kol. 2015: Structuring archaeological evidence: The Archaeological Map of the Czech Republic and related information systems. Prague. \nKuna\, M. et al. 2004: Nedestruktivní archeologie. Teorie\, metody a cíle. [Non-destructive archaeology. Theory\, methods and goals]. Praha. \nvan Leusen\, M. 2002: Pattern to Process: Methodological Investigations into the Formation and Interpretation of Spatial Patterns in Archaeological Landscapes. Utrecht. \nWheatley\, D. – Gillings\, M. 2002: Spatial Technology and Archaeology: The archaeological applications of GIS. London – New York. \nhttp://www.aiscr.cz/en/ – Archaeological Information System of the Czech Republic \n\n\n\n\n\n3 January: Final Essay
URL:https://medievista.cz/akce/digital-humanities-and-the-study-of-the-past/2017-10-18/
LOCATION:Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Karlovy – Hybernská 3\, Hybernská 3\, Praha 1\, 11800
CATEGORIES:Doktorandské,Periodické,Přednášky,Vše
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://medievista.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/banner_web.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171019T081500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171020T190000
DTSTAMP:20260405T220351
CREATED:20171014T193042Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20171014T193625Z
UID:10001186-1508400900-1508526000@medievista.cz
SUMMARY:Language Contact and the Early Slavs
DESCRIPTION:The workshop addresses one of the most controversial issues in contemporary medieval studies\, which is the extremely fast expansion of the Slavic language(s) across great parts of Europe in the Early Middle Ages. While traditional scenarios assume unity of language\, ethnicity\, and material culture\, leading alternative models emphasize the active role of material culture\, through which ethnic identity was constructed to mobilize linguistically extremely heterogeneous population. The traditionalists explain the spread of the Proto-Slavic language by migrations in the 6th-7th century and associate that with specific material culture and with early mentions of ethnic Slavs in written sources. The alternative hypotheses attribute the same material culture and written references to linguistically and genetically very varied communities and associate the subsequent spread of the Proto-Slavic with its status as an ‘official’ language or ‘koiné’. In other words\, early ethnic Slavs did not speak Proto-Slavic\, no Slavic ‘Urheimat’ did exist\, and Slavic speakers may not have common roots.
URL:https://medievista.cz/akce/language-contact-and-the-early-slavs/
LOCATION:Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Karlovy – Hybernská 3\, Hybernská 3\, Praha 1\, 11800
CATEGORIES:Konference a semináře,Vše
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://medievista.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/earlyslavs.png
ORGANIZER;CN="V%C3%BDzkumn%C3%A1 skupina Identity v pohybu%3A jazyk%2C hmotn%C3%A1 kultura%2C n%C3%A1bo%C5%BEenstv%C3%AD a etnicita v ran%C3%A9m st%C5%99edov%C4%9Bku":MAILTO:tomas.klir@ff.cuni.cz
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171024T163000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171024T183000
DTSTAMP:20260405T220351
CREATED:20171005T074722Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20171005T074722Z
UID:10001183-1508862600-1508869800@medievista.cz
SUMMARY:Krajina středověkých kostelů
DESCRIPTION:Přednáší: PhDr. Roman Lavička\, Ph.D. / Národní památkový ústav\, České Budějovice \nKostely se od raného středověku staly neodmyslitelným prvkem kulturní krajiny\, kterou utvářely generace obyvatel. Jejich siluety doplnily obvykle výrazné krajinné útvary – vrcholy\, návrší\, terénní zlomy\, mnohdy ve vazbě na starší osídlení či opevnění\, někdy vyrostly na křižovatce starších cest a staly se zárodky vznikajícího venkovského nebo městského osídlení. \nVýraznou změnu přinesl pozdní středověk\, kdy došlo k rozvoji techniky zvonařství\, což vedlo ke stavbě zvonic – věží\, které byly do té doby výsadou jen nemnoha šlechtických kostelů a chrámů ve velkých městech. V krajině i panoramatu měst tak došlo k výraznému uplatnění kostelů jako dominant s vysokými a zdaleka patrnými věžemi. \nKostel jako středobod života věřícího člověka a celé společnosti naplňoval nejen jeho duchovní potřeby\, ale v neklidných dobách poskytoval i potřebné útočiště před nebezpečenstvími tohoto světa\, což se někdy promítlo do podoby kostelů ve formě obranných prvků ­– zdí\, věží a útočištných prostor. V přednášce se budeme zabývat funkcí a vlivem kostela na utváření krajiny\, směr komunikací a podobu navazující zástavby. \nKoná se v rámci přednáškového cyklu Památkový rozměr jihočeské krajiny.
URL:https://medievista.cz/akce/krajina-stredovekych-kostelu/
LOCATION:NPÚ ÚOP v Českých Budějovicích\, Senovážné náměstí 6\, České Budějovice\, 370 21
CATEGORIES:Přednášky,Vše
ORGANIZER;CN="NP%C3%9A %C3%9AOP v %C4%8Cesk%C3%BDch Bud%C4%9Bjovic%C3%ADch":MAILTO:sekretariat.cb@npu.cz
GEO:48.973226;14.4793685
X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION;VALUE=URI;X-ADDRESS=NPÚ ÚOP v Českých Budějovicích Senovážné náměstí 6 České Budějovice 370 21;X-APPLE-RADIUS=500;X-TITLE=Senovážné náměstí 6:geo:14.4793685,48.973226
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171025T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171026T120000
DTSTAMP:20260405T220351
CREATED:20171025T074905Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20171025T081834Z
UID:10001190-1508922000-1509019200@medievista.cz
SUMMARY:Kosmas\, Gallus Anonymus a Nestor v transkulturní perspektivě. Kronikáři a jejich dílo jako inspirace pro vědu\, umění\, politiku a historickou tradici
DESCRIPTION:Kde: Hlavní budova AV ČR\, sál 206 \nstředa 25. 10. 2017\n8\,30 – 9\,00 registrace účastníků\n 9\,00 – 9\,30 uvítání účastníků konference\n(doc. PhDr. Martin Holý\, Ph.D.\, ředitel HÚ AVČR) \n9\,30 – 10\,30\n Úvodní referáty\nprof. dr hab. Marek Cetwiński (Częstochowa) – Ustanowianie tradycji: Gall\, Kosmas\, Nestor \ndoc. PhDr. Vratislav Vaníček\, Ph.D. (Praha) – Transkulturní retrospektiva u Kosmy\, Galla a Nestora \n10\,30 – 10\,40 coffee break \n10\,40 – 11\,40 Text jako zdroj idejí \ndr hab. Marceli Antoniewicz\, prof. AJD (Częstochowa) – Mityczne genealogie Piastów\, Przemyślidów i Rurykowiczów w narracjach kronik Galla\, Kosmasa\ni Nestora \ndoc. PhDr. Tomáš Petráček\, Ph.D.\, Th.D. (Hradec Králové) – Kosmas a fenomén christianizace ve světle transkulturní komunikace \ndr. Оксана Ластовська (Київ) – Християнське чернецтво в працях Косми\, Галла Аноніма та Нестора-літописця \n11\,40 – 11\,55 diskuse \n12\,00 – 13\,20 společný oběd \n13\,20 – 14\,40 Mezi historiografií a historickou tradicí \nprof. dr hab. Aleksander Mikołajczak a dr Rafał Dymczyk (Poznań) – Warsztat pisarski Anonima Galla \nprof. dr. hab.\, member-corr. of NASU Oлександр Моця (Київ) – Географічне визначення „Руської землі“ за середньовічними хроніками \nprof. dr hab. Andrzej Stroynowski (Częstochowa) – Rola kronik w kształtowaniu oświeceniowej wizji początków państwa polskiego \ndr Norbert Morawiec (Częstochowa) – Kronikarz i rewolucja. Michaił Tichomirow wobec relacji Nestora o wydarzeniach 1068–69 w Kijowie \n14\,40 – 15:00 diskuse \n15\,00 – 15\,20 coffee break \n15\,20 – 16\,40 Středověké kroniky v zrcadle novověké a moderní historiografie \nprof. dr. hab. Валерій Ластовський (Київ) – Українська історіографія і східноєвропейське літописання \nprof. dr hab. Tadeusz Srogosz a dr Anna Czerniecka-Haberko (Częstochowa) – Gall Anonim i jego Kronika w piśmiennictwie historycznym Pawła Jasienicy \ndr hab. Małgorzata Durbas\, prof. AJD (Częstochowa) – Cosmas de Prague i Bohême w świetle historiografii francuskiej XVII/XVIII wieku \ndr. Костянтин Крайній (Київ) – Ранньослов’янські літописи і хроніки в київських церковно-історичних студіях ХІХ – початку ХХ ст. \n16\,40 – 17\,00 diskuse \n17\,00 – 17\,20 coffee break \n17\,30 Kytarový recitál Davida Wurczela s projekcí videoartu \n19\,00 Společenský večer \nčtvrtek 26. 10. 2017\n9\,00 – 10\,00 Obrazy v kronikách a kroniky v obrazech \ndr. Ольга Крайня (Київ) – Традиція вшанування прп. Нестора-літописця як автора „Повісті временних літ“ в історико-антропологічному вимірі \ndr. Natallia Slizh (Grodno) – Krzyż\, miecz i … Obraz wojownika-rycerza\n(od Nestora do latopisów Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego) \nprof. PhDr. Vít Vlnas\, Ph.D. (Praha) – Kroniky jako zdroj vizuálních představ\no české minulosti \n10\,00 – 10\,15 diskuse \n10\,15 – 10\,30 coffee break \n10\,30 – 11\,10 Kroniky v popkultuře \nPhDr. Václava Kofránková\, Ph.D. (Praha) – Kosmas literární a filmový. Kosmova kronika jako zdroj umělecké imaginace \ndr hab. Wiktor Werner\, prof. UAM (Poznań) – Cyfrowe życie średniowiecznych kronikarzy. Zagadnienie recepcji Kosmasa z Pragi\, Thietmara z Merseburga\, Anonima zw. Gallem i Nestora w sieci WWW w kontekście badań nad tożsamość historyczną współczesnych Europejczyków \n11\,10 – 11\,30 diskuse \n11\,30 závěrečné slovo \n12\,00 společný oběd
URL:https://medievista.cz/akce/kosmas-gallus-anonymus-a-nestor-v-transkulturni-perspektive-kronikari-a-jejich-dilo-jako-inspirace-pro-vedu-umeni-politiku-a-historickou-tradici/
LOCATION:Hlavní budova Akademie věd\, Národní 3\, Praha 1\, 117 20\, Česká republika
CATEGORIES:Konference a semináře,Vše
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://medievista.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Kosmas_Gallus_Nestor.png
ORGANIZER;CN="Historick%C3%BD %C3%BAstav AV %C4%8CR":MAILTO:sekretariat@hiu.cas.cz
GEO:50.0816138;14.4142
X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION;VALUE=URI;X-ADDRESS=Hlavní budova Akademie věd Národní 3 Praha 1 117 20 Česká republika;X-APPLE-RADIUS=500;X-TITLE=Národní 3:geo:14.4142,50.0816138
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171025T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171025T190000
DTSTAMP:20260405T220351
CREATED:20171003T063752Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20171009T090206Z
UID:10001172-1508952600-1508958000@medievista.cz
SUMMARY:Digital Humanities and the Study of the Past
DESCRIPTION:The guest lecture series Digital Humanities and the Study of the Past (part of the Medieval Social Conflicts and Contrasts project) attempts to bring scholars working in the emerging field of Digital Humanities with the focus on Medieval or Early Modern topics to both local and international audience at the Faculty of Arts\, Charles University\, Prague. We hope to cover a number of a wide field of approaches and angles through presentations of successful digital projects or notable works in progress. \nThe 2017/18 Winter Term is convened by: Ondřej Tichý \nCourse material and student requirements are specified in Moodle\, SIS Code: AAA500153 (local students)\, AAA500153E (Erasmus students) \nProgramme / Syllabus at https://css.ff.cuni.cz/en/lecture-series-medieval-conflicts-and-contrasts/the-digital-methodologies-in-the-study-of-the-past/ \n\n\n4 October: Daniel Bradley\, Molecular Population Genetics Lab\, Trinity College\, Dublin\n\n\n\nBooks\, Bones and Genomes: DNA analysis of parchments and archaeological remains\n\nBy comparing genomes from ancient animals and humans we can uncover new information about the past.  This is a golden age of ancient DNA. Knowledge of those materials which preserve DNA best such as parchments or particularly dense mammalian bones\, coupled with new sequencing technologies\, has enabled us to retrieve whole genomes from the past on a routine basis.  This has allowed us\, for example\, to add a dimension to the material study of ancient manuscripts and to infer the major population transitions in European prehistory\, placing migration firmly back as a central theme in understanding cultural change. \nReferences: \n\nGenomic signals of migration and continuity in Britain before the Anglo-Saxons. Martiniano R\, et al Nat Commun. 2016 Jan 19;7:10326. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10326.\nNeolithic and Bronze Age migration to Ireland and establishment of the insular Atlantic genome. Cassidy LM\, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 12;113(2):368-73. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518445113. Epub 2015 Dec 28.\nThe York Gospels: a one thousand year biological  palimpsest    Matthew D. Teasdale et al. 2017 BiorXiv  doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/146324.\nUpper Palaeolithic genomes reveal deep roots of modern Eurasians. Jones ER\, et al. Nat Commun. 2015 Nov 16;6:8912. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9912.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n11 October: Michael Pidd\, Director of The Digital Humanities Institute\, University of Sheffield\n\n\n\nManuscripts\, Models\, and Ownership: Bringing Data Together\n\nConnected Histories (http://www.connectedhistories.org) and its sister site Manuscripts Online (http://www.manuscriptsonline.org) enable users to undertake structured searches across many distributed online historical datasets. The combined resources equate to approximately 30 billion data records. The aim was to realise the dream that mutliple datasets can be brought together in one place and combined to create new knowledge\, but the process of doing this was challenging due to the nature of the datasets themselves: strange transcriptions; weird data models; and restrictive ownership. In this talk I will explore the difficulties of developing research resources for historical and literary studies that use multiple datasets\, and show some of the computational (and human!) solutions for addressing these problems. Examples will be taken from the following DHI projects: Manuscripts Online\, Connected Histories\, Intoxicants and Early Modernity\, and Digital Panopticon. The talk will also introduce the following technologies and methods for non-experts: data capture\, data modelling\, licensing\, data visualisation\, natural language processing\, and nominal record linkage. \n\n\n\n\n\n18 October: Reading Week (No Lecture)\n\n\n\n\n\n25 October: Marjorie Burghart\, Centre national de la recherche scientifique\, Lyon\n\n\n\nDigital Editions and the TEI standard for DH\nAbstract coming soon…\n\n\n\n\n1 November: Brittany Schorn\, Department of Anglo-Saxon\, Norse and Celtic\, University of Cambridge\n\n\n\nGersum: Identifying Old Norse lexis in the Poetry of the Alliterative Revival\n\nThe study of the rich and diverse Old Norse influence on the medieval English lexicon is very challenging\, not least etymologically: given the genetic proximity of the languages in contact\, it can be extremely difficult to identify which English words really do show input from Old Norse. In recent years there has been intensive etymological and contextual work on the Norse-derived vocabulary of some texts and traditions\, especially before c. 1300 (see esp. Pons-Sanz 2007\, 2013; Dance 2003\, 2011).  Nevertheless\, the Scandinavian influence on the vocabulary of the great later Middle English literary monuments has rarely seen sustained exploration\, and texts composed in the north and east of England\, where the influence from Old Norse is attested in its greatest range and complexity\, have not been treated together in a major\, etymologically analytical study since Björkman’s survey of 1900–2. \nIn this paper\, I shall describe the new methodological framework developed for the Gersum Project (a three-year project\, begun in January 2016 and funded by the U.K.’s Arts and Humanities Research Council; see www.gersum.org) which is undertaking a detailed study of the etymologies of c. 1600 words for which Old Norse input has been claimed\, by means of a searchable online database. \nWorks Cited \nBjörkman\, E.\, Scandinavian Loan-Words in Middle English\, 2 vols.\, Studien zur englischen Philologie 7\, 11 (Halle\, 1900–2) \nDance\, R.\, Words Derived from Old Norse in Early Middle English: Studies in the Vocabulary of the South-West Midland Texts\, Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies 246 (Tempe\, AZ\, 2003) \n———\, ‘“Tomarȝan hit is awane”: Words Derived from Old Norse in Four Lambeth Homilies’\, in Foreign Influences on Medieval English\, ed. J. Fisiak and M. Bator\, Studies in English Medieval Language and Literature 28 (Frankfurt am Main\, 2011)\, pp. 77–127 \nPons-Sanz\, S. M.\, Norse-Derived Vocabulary in Late Old English Texts: Wulfstan’s Works\, a Case Study\, NOWELE Supplement Series 22 (Odense\, 2007) \n———\, The Lexical Effects of Anglo-Scandinavian Linguistic Contact on Old English\, Studies in the Early Middle Ages 1 (Turnhout\, 2013) \nTownend\, M.\, Language and History in Viking Age England: Linguistic Relations Between Speakers of Old Norse and Old English\, Studies in the Early Middle Ages 6 (Turnhout\, 2002) \n\n\n\n\n\n8 November: Kerstin Majewski\, Instituts für Englische Philologie\, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München\n\n\n\nThe Runes Project & The Reconstruction of the Runes on the Ruthwell Cross\n\nThis paper introduces the research project RuneS and deals in detail with one of its doctoral theses. \nThe research project “Runic writing in the Germanic languages (RuneS)”\, funded by the Union of the German Academies of Sciences and based at the Goettingen Academy of Sciences and Humanities\, includes three research units\, at the universities of Kiel\, Goettingen\, and Eichstätt-Munich. The project analyzes the runic script as a writing system within its historico-cultural context. It especially focuses on phonemic\, graphemic and text-pragmatic aspects\, in particular on investigating the relationship between runic and Latin writing. \nThe doctoral thesis The Reconstruction of the Runic Text on the Ruthwell Cross has grown out of the Eichstätt-Munich research group. It deals with the longest inscription in Old English runes\, which is carved on two panels of the 8th ct. Ruthwell Cross ‒ a Christian stone-cross now located in Dumfries and Galloway\, Scotland. The inscription is comprised of a four stanza poem written in an early Northumbrian dialect. The poem narrates the crucifixion episode from a unique point of view: the cross is the speaker. \nThe thesis attempts to reconstruct the Ruthwell Crucifixion Poem. With one third of the runes illegible\, a restoration of the text proves to be difficult. What is more\, in some instances even the remaining runes have encouraged scholarly debate. For example\, the Old English word rōdi ‘rod’\, referring to Christ’s cross\, shows an unusal i-ending; recently\, the form stemn ‘stem (of a tree)’ has been suggested instead\, considering rōdi a mistake by the carver/designer. The present paper discusses the use of Old English rōd ‘rod; cross’ and gealga ‘gallows; cross’ written on the Ruthwell Cross through a comparative analysis of the runic poem with contemporary religious texts in Latin and Old English. \n\n \nThe Ruthwell Cross\, West Face (Majewski 2012) \n\n\n \nThe Ruthwell Cross\, East Face (Majewski 2012) \n\n\n\n\n\n\n15 November (in Czech): Boris Lehečka\, Institute of Czech Language\, Czech Academy of Sciences\, Prague\n\n\n\nDigital and analog humanities: one or two worlds?\n\nPřednáška představí na příkladu diachronní bohemistiky názory klasických\, „analogových“ lingvistů na možnosti využití digitálních technologií při jejich práci\, a to z pohledu počítačového odborníka\, který se snaží prosazovat moderní technologie v tomto oboru od počátku 21. století. Výsledkem společného úsilí jsou zejména stránky Vokabulář webový (http://vokabular.ujc.cas.cz). Přednášející se pokusí hledat cestu\, jak analogové a digitální humanitní vědy sbližovat. \nIllustrated by the example of diachronic Czech studies\, the lecture will present the ideas of the classical “analog” linguists concerning of using digital technologies in their work. These ideas will be reflected from the point of view of a computer expert who has been striving to promote modern technologies in this field from the beginning of the 21st Century. The web site Vokabulář webový (Web Vocabulary; http://vokabular.ujc.cas.cz) represents a good example of such a joint effort. The presenter will focus on finding paths towards convergence of the analog and digital humanities. \n\n\n\n\n\n22 November: Franz Fischer\, Cologne Center for eHumanities\, Universität zu Köln\n\n\n\nPeople from the Past – Saint Patrick\, the Emperor and Pessoa through their Writings\n\nIn my talk\, I am going to present a wide range of digital edition projects I am involved in as an editor and collaborator at the Cologne Center for eHumanities. A focus will be on the methodologies applied in order to find answers to the old and fundamental question of what famous people of the past actually wrote. What do we really know about Patrick\, the patron Saint of Ireland? What did the original decrees of early medieval emperors and rulers look like? What did Magister Guillelmus actually teach to his students in the early days of the Parisian university? What is the nature of the ingenious and chimerical work of the Portuguese poet Fernando Pessoa? How did the virtuous Swiss writer Hermann Burger create his first novel? How did the great German sociologist Niklas Luhmann develop his systems theory in practical terms? \n\n\n\n\n\n29 November: Catherine Richardson\, Centre for Medieval and Early Modern Studies (School of English)\, University of Kent\n\n\n\nEarly modern English domestic interiors – digital methods\n\nThe early modern English household was central to early modern life – the foundational space of social\, economic\, religious and political cultures. It was not\, of course\, just a family matter: it was seen as crucial for the maintenance of early modern social order\, as household heads were responsible for their families\, servants and apprentices. Actions within the household were therefore foundational to the formation of status and gendered identity\, but also had wide political consequences – they mattered greatly in early modern England. The wider project from which this paper comes seeks to understand domestic experience – what it felt like to live in such a household\, and what defined the connections between spaces\, objects and human activity. \nThe paper surveys the digital methods by which we have explored the structuring of domestic experience\, including mobile eye-tracking\, 3D scanning and room reconstruction of various kinds\, and time-lapse photography. It investigates the benefits and frustrations of these methods for addressing such questions as: how were behaviours located within an evolving domestic material environment? How were lifestyles formed day by day\, hour by hour? Finally\, in conclusion\, it aims to imagine what other digital possibilities there might be for exploring and representing domestic experience in the future\, and what questions they may be able to address. \n  \n\n\n\n\n\n6 December: Jenny Benham\, School of History\, Archaeology and Religion\, Cardiff University\n\n\n\nEarly English Laws Project\n\nAbstract coming soon… \nhttp://www.earlyenglishlaws.ac.uk/ \n\n\n\n\n\n13 December: Tuomas Heikkilä\, Faculty of Theology\, University of Helsinki\n\n\n\nManuscripts and Computers: Exploring Medieval Textual Traditions (Stemmatology)\n\nPast decades have experienced the rise of new\, innovative methods within the field of textual scholarship. Philologists and historians have found new friends in computer scientists\, evolutionary biologists\, statisticians\, and mathematicians\, for instance\, and the humanities are now eagerly cooperating with the sciences. \nThe lecture explores and illustrates some fresh approaches\, new possibilities and computerized tools designed for studying ancient and medieval textual traditions. What is the current status quo of the field? How can the novel methods help the scholar of old texts in establishing the critical text\, and in studying the cultural history of a textual tradition? \n\n\n\n\n\n20 December: David Novák\, Institute of Acrheology\, Czech Academy of Sciences\n\n\n\nGeographic Information Systems in Archeology\n\nArchaeology is a field of research highly interconnected with the spatial information. Therefore in 1990s\, introduction of the GIS brought rapid development in the archaeological methods and theory\, esp. concerning landscape archaeology\, documentation techniques and spatial analysis. Lecture will provide general overview of the possible applications of the GIS in archaeology; in higher detail\, it will stress importance of the digital tools for landscape research (spatial relations\, remote sensing\, geomorphometry) and for the building of common knowledge base (predictive modelling; digital infrastructures). \nResources: \nGojda\, M. – John\, J. (eds.) 2013: Archaeology and Airborne Laser Scanning of the Landscape. Plzeň. \nHengl\, T. – Reuter\, H.I. (eds.) 2009: Geomorphometry: Concepts\, Software\, Applications. Amsterdam. \nKuna a kol. 2015: Structuring archaeological evidence: The Archaeological Map of the Czech Republic and related information systems. Prague. \nKuna\, M. et al. 2004: Nedestruktivní archeologie. Teorie\, metody a cíle. [Non-destructive archaeology. Theory\, methods and goals]. Praha. \nvan Leusen\, M. 2002: Pattern to Process: Methodological Investigations into the Formation and Interpretation of Spatial Patterns in Archaeological Landscapes. Utrecht. \nWheatley\, D. – Gillings\, M. 2002: Spatial Technology and Archaeology: The archaeological applications of GIS. London – New York. \nhttp://www.aiscr.cz/en/ – Archaeological Information System of the Czech Republic \n\n\n\n\n\n3 January: Final Essay
URL:https://medievista.cz/akce/digital-humanities-and-the-study-of-the-past/2017-10-25/
LOCATION:Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Karlovy – Hybernská 3\, Hybernská 3\, Praha 1\, 11800
CATEGORIES:Doktorandské,Periodické,Přednášky,Vše
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://medievista.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/banner_web.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171031T155000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20171031T172000
DTSTAMP:20260405T220351
CREATED:20171020T092658Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20171025T081555Z
UID:10001189-1509465000-1509470400@medievista.cz
SUMMARY:Karolingische Herrscherurkunden
DESCRIPTION:V týdnu od 30. 10. 2017 zavítá na Ústav pomocných věd historických a archivnictví Prof. Dr. Irmgard Fees (Historische Grundwissenschaften und Historische Medienkunde\, Historisches Seminar der Ludwig-Maxmilian-Universität München)\, pronese dvě přednášky a povede seminář pro studenty. \nProf. Fees je přední znalkyní diplomatiky a paleografie raného a vrcholného středověku. Odborně se zabývala úředními písemnostmi v italských městech raného a vrcholného středověku\, listinami franských králů a římských císařů z rodu Karlovců (8.-10. století) a nyní především papežskou diplomatikou. Vedle toho je šéfredaktorkou ústředního odborného časopisu pro pomocné vědy historické v německy mluvících zemích – Archiv für Diplomatik\, Schriftgeschichte\, Siegel- und Wappenkunde. \nProf. Fees nejprve pronese 31. října od 15:50 v učebně B2.34 přednášku o nejstarších karolinských listinách. Na tuto přednášku navážou ve stejný čas 1. a 2. listopadu dva semináře zaměřené na četbu a interpretaci těchto listin. Přednáška je veřejná\, zájemci o účast na semináři se mohou hlásit na barova@phil.muni.cz. \nPoté pro. Fees vystoupí v rámci LVIII. medievistického pátku s tématem notářská znamení v Itálii v raném a vrcholném středověku. Přednáška se uskuteční v pátek 3. listopadu od 14:10 v učebně B2.34\, FF MU.
URL:https://medievista.cz/akce/karolingische-herrscherurkunden/
LOCATION:Filozofická fakulta Masarykovy univerzity\, Arna Nováka 1\, Brno\, 60200
CATEGORIES:Doktorandské,Přednášky,Vše
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://medievista.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/herrscher_urkunden.jpg
ORGANIZER;CN="%C3%9Astav PVH a archivnictv%C3%AD Filozofick%C3%A9 fakulty Masarykovy univerzity":MAILTO:wpvh@phil.muni.cz
GEO:49.2005491;16.5983999
X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION;VALUE=URI;X-ADDRESS=Filozofická fakulta Masarykovy univerzity Arna Nováka 1 Brno 60200;X-APPLE-RADIUS=500;X-TITLE=Arna Nováka 1:geo:16.5983999,49.2005491
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR